This page (revision-7) was last changed on 07-Dec-2016 14:14 by PeterYoung

This page was created on 19-Mar-2010 16:02 by PeterYoung

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
7 07-Dec-2016 14:14 5 KB PeterYoung to previous
6 19-Mar-2010 17:38 5 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
5 19-Mar-2010 17:25 5 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
4 19-Mar-2010 17:11 4 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
3 19-Mar-2010 16:18 3 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
2 19-Mar-2010 16:07 3 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
1 19-Mar-2010 16:02 2 KB PeterYoung to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 44 added 2 lines
The SW windows all behave the same. In particular there are only dark exposures and each of these exposures correspond to zero exposure times. The LW windows show different behavior, and also show differences amongst each other. Some details are discussed below.
At line 54 changed one line
The spectra in the two weird windows have high values for about 75% of the window but then drop to zero. It is not clear if the bright pixels actually contain good data points as the lines in the windows are weak, however I believe they do not contain good data. Note that the magnitude of the spectrum in the two windows is different by a factor of about 2.3. This is close to the difference in effective areas between the two wavelengths (factor of 2.2, with 279.80 being more sensitive).
The spectra in the two weird windows have high values for about 75% of the window but then drop to zero. It is not clear if the bright pixels actually contain good data points as the lines in the windows are weak, however I believe they do not contain good data.
In addition to the problems above, we also note that exposure 60 which is sandwiched between two missing exposures of the LW channel shows strange spectra.