This page (revision-7) was last changed on 07-Dec-2016 14:14 by PeterYoung

This page was created on 19-Mar-2010 16:02 by PeterYoung

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
7 07-Dec-2016 14:14 5 KB PeterYoung to previous
6 19-Mar-2010 17:38 5 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
5 19-Mar-2010 17:25 5 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
4 19-Mar-2010 17:11 4 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
3 19-Mar-2010 16:18 3 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
2 19-Mar-2010 16:07 3 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
1 19-Mar-2010 16:02 2 KB PeterYoung to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
BadExposureExample
BadExposureExample

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 1 added 2 lines
[{ALLOW edit EISMainUsers}]
[{ALLOW view Anonymous}]
At line 3 changed one line
The study PRY_footpoints_HI2 is an interesting test case as it has a large number of wavelength windows (23) and the windows vary significantly in size.
The study PRY_footpoints_HI2 is an interesting test case as it has a large number of wavelength windows (23) and the windows vary significantly in size. I consider the observation obtained on 2009 December 11, 19:50.
At line 5 changed one line
There are 6 problem exposures: numbers 26, 57, 58, 59, 61 and 88.
There are 6 problem exposures: numbers 26, 57, 58, 59, 61 and 88. (Note: I'm numbering the exposures in reverse time order thus my exposure 88 is actually the 2nd exposure in time, exposure 61 is the 29th in time, etc.)
At line 9 changed one line
The table below goes through wavelength window and indicates the problems for the 6 exposures.
The table below goes through each wavelength window and indicates the problems for the 6 exposures.
At line 65 changed one line
Exposure 60 shows this affect only for the LW window - the SW windows are OK. Also the Mg VII 280.75 and Fe XV 284.16 are OK as well. Note that these windows are the only LW windows for which exposure 61. It thus seems that the reason exposure 60 has problems is because it is sandwiched between two dark exposures.
Exposure 60 shows this effect only for the LW window - the SW windows are OK. Also the Mg VII 280.75 and Fe XV 284.16 are OK as well. Note that these windows are the only LW windows for which exposure 61. It thus seems that the reason exposure 60 has problems is because it is sandwiched between two dark exposures.
This page (revision-7) was last changed on 07-Dec-2016 14:14 by PeterYoungTop