This page (revision-4) was last changed on 07-Dec-2016 14:14 by Gardini

This page was created on 20-Mar-2009 15:30 by PeterYoung

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
4 07-Dec-2016 14:14 2 KB Gardini to previous
3 20-Mar-2009 15:41 1 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
2 20-Mar-2009 15:40 1 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
1 20-Mar-2009 15:30 1 KB PeterYoung to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
WarmPixelStudy
WarmPixelStudy

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 17 added one line
The following recommendations are made:
At line 19 added 4 lines
# Scientists should always use interpolated intensities and errors for missing pixels when analysing EIS data. Significant errors may result if missing pixels are simply ignored, particularly as the number of warm pixels on the detector increases.
# The method for interpolating the intensity of missing pixels in EIS_PREP should be modified.
# The error bars assigned to interpolated data points should be estimated through comparison with non-missing pixels, but modified according to how the interpolated intensity value was derived.
# Accurate re-creation of line fit parameters appears to be possible even up to the case of 30~\%\ warm pixels. This corresponds to a lifetime of around 6 years considering the current rate of increase of warm pixels on the EIS detectors.
This page (revision-4) was last changed on 07-Dec-2016 14:14 by GardiniTop