This page (revision-13) was last changed on 07-Dec-2016 14:14 by Peter Young

This page was created on 23-Oct-2014 18:27 by Peter Young

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
13 07-Dec-2016 14:14 5 KB Peter Young to previous
12 04-Nov-2014 16:10 4 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
11 04-Nov-2014 16:09 4 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
10 30-Oct-2014 19:44 3 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
9 30-Oct-2014 19:42 3 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
8 29-Oct-2014 17:16 3 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
7 27-Oct-2014 18:59 3 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
6 27-Oct-2014 18:47 2 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
5 27-Oct-2014 18:42 2 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
4 27-Oct-2014 13:43 2 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
3 24-Oct-2014 20:28 1 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
2 23-Oct-2014 18:44 1 KB Peter Young to previous | to last
1 23-Oct-2014 18:27 803 bytes Peter Young to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
AR12192obs
AR12192obs

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 1 added 2 lines
[{ALLOW edit EISMainUsers}]
[{ALLOW view Anonymous}]
At line 142 changed one line
The XRT flag was being used with Flare266_Hunter02 on 28-29 October. Several of the studies triggered almost immediately.
The XRT flag was being used with Flare266_Hunter02 on 28-29 October. Several of the studies triggered almost immediately (in fact it seems the hunter study didn't even run).
At line 152 changed one line
Flare response at 10:43 (6 rasters).
Flare response at 10:43 (6 rasters). The trigger doesn't seem to have worked, but the raster did catch a C7 flare at 11:05. Pointing not ideal, though,
At line 156 changed one line
Flare response at 14:45 (6 rasters).
Flare response at 14:45 (6 rasters). Caught late decay phase of M2 flare (peak 14:05). Flare loop seems to be visible at bottom of raster in Ca XVII. Pointing is bad.
At line 160 changed one line
Flare response at 18:17 (6 rasters).
Flare response at 18:17 (6 rasters). There is no significant flare that could have caused this trigger. Pointing is very similar to previous two response studies.
At line 164 changed one line
Flare response at 22:54 (6 rasters).
Flare response at 22:54 (6 rasters). Again, no significant flare had occurred. Pointing is same as previous studies.
At line 170 changed one line
Flare response at 03:30 (6 rasters).
Flare response at 03:30 (6 rasters). This seems to have worked well. Response started during rise of C9 flare. Rise is slow with three peaks. However, pointing is still bad (looks to be same as previous response studies).
This page (revision-13) was last changed on 07-Dec-2016 14:14 by Peter YoungTop