This page (revision-5) was last changed on 07-Dec-2016 14:14 by PeterYoung

This page was created on 18-Apr-2008 10:23 by PeterYoung

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
5 07-Dec-2016 14:14 2 KB PeterYoung to previous
4 02-May-2008 11:59 2 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
3 01-May-2008 15:49 2 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
2 18-Apr-2008 10:29 2 KB PeterYoung to previous | to last
1 18-Apr-2008 10:23 2 KB PeterYoung to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
SpectralTilt
SpectralTilt

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 1 changed 3 lines
[{ALLOW edit EISMainUsers}]
[{ALLOW view Anonymous}]
!!! The effects of the spectrum rotation on line ratios
!!! The effects of the spectral tilt on line ratios
At line 5 changed one line
The EIS spectral images are not exactly aligned relative to the CCD and, for the SW band, images at shorter wavelengths are slightly higher on the CCD compared to longer wavelengths. The effect is small and, for example, for the Fe XII 186.88 and 195.12 lines it's less than 1 pixel. The effect is caused by the dispersion axis of the grating not being exactly aligned with the CCD axis (i.e., the grating is tilted) and we refer to it here as the "spectrum rotation". This is different to the "slit tilt" which arises from a misalignment of the EIS slits relative to the CCD.
The EIS spectral images are not exactly aligned relative to the CCD and, for the SW band, images at shorter wavelengths are slightly higher on the CCD compared to longer wavelengths. The effect is small and, for example, for the Fe XII 186.88 and 195.12 lines it's less than 1 pixel.
At line 7 removed 2 lines
Both the spectrum rotation and slit tilt were features of SOHO/CDS and the attached image (CCD.gif) produced for CDS illustrates what both effects do to the spectral images. Note that the spectrum rotation makes no contribution to the slit tilt.
At line 17 changed one line
The attached plot (fe12_offset_check.pdf) compares the densities derived from the two Fe XII ratios before applying the offset (top panel) and after applying the offset (bottom panel). The vertical lines show the errors on the density based on the 1-sigma intensity errors output by eis_prep. The change is quite striking. Note the peaks around pixels 96-100. Before they were about 3-4 pixels apart, but with the correction they miraculously coincide! Initially this doesn't make sense as the image offsets are sub-pixel, but my theory is that they get significantly amplified when taking ratios. Note that the densities derived from the two ratios don't agree with each other, but this is a separate issue (!).
The attached plot compares the densities derived from these two ratios before applying the offset (top panel) and after applying the offset (bottom panel). The vertical lines show the errors on the density based on the 1-sigma intensity errors output by eis_prep. The change is quite striking. Note the peaks around pixels 96-100. Before they were about 3-4 pixels apart, but with the correction they miraculously coincide! Initially this doesn't make sense as the image offsets are sub-pixel, but my theory is that they get significantly amplified when taking ratios. It gets even worse if you use the density to then derive the column depth and filling factor.
At line 19 changed one line
I estimate the slope of the spectrum on the detector to be -0.0792 pixels/angstrom. To do this I compared images in the following line pairs: Fe VIII 185.21/194.66, Fe XII 186.88/196.64, Fe XII 192.39/195.12 and Fe XII 195.12/203.72. It's not easy to find good data to measure this, particularly for Fe XII, as you need compact features to do it well. Note that the tilt of the LW band will need to measured separately.
I estimate the slope of the spectrum on the detector to be -0.0792 pixels/angstrom. To do this I compared images in the following line pairs: Fe VIII 185.21/194.66, Fe XII 186.88/196.64, Fe XII 192.39/195.12 and Fe XII 195.12/203.72. It's not easy to find good data to measure this, particularly for Fe XII, as you need compact features to do it well.
This page (revision-5) was last changed on 07-Dec-2016 14:14 by PeterYoungTop