This page (revision-828) was last changed on 03-Feb-2017 10:35 by Denver

This page was created on 04-Feb-2009 11:25 by David R Williams

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
828 03-Feb-2017 10:35 18 KB Denver to previous The line's engaged cena anafranilu Minter is now trying his hand at headhunting

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
TeamXRTSOTJointMeetingMar09
TeamXRTSOTJointMeetingMar09

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 95 added one line
some people didn't know how big the EIS slit was and in general people didn't know what to ask for for morphology studies. ''maybe that cadence isn't the primary factor, then -- work on informing people about spatial coverage in a given time frame''.
At line 97 added one line
* Polar jets: XRT are interested in getting densities out of them.
At line 99 added one line
* CMEs See dimmings in XRT. If EIS were pointed at the same place.
At line 101 added one line
*outflows: SO much easier to find in EIS than in XRT. Great use of EIS.
At line 103 added 9 lines
*Sheared loops within filament channels.
*Coronal waves
-- What have we learned to do to improve observations. Every time we want to look at the high-T plasma, we should have a programme where we know what XRT, EIS and SOT are doing.
This page (revision-828) was last changed on 03-Feb-2017 10:35 by DenverTop