This is EIS Data Processing and Analysis page.
#
All related materials go here, thanks.
We have run 40 " slot time-series data. Once we run the eis_prep with /noabs
keyword then we get the Intensity in 'DN' units. While, when we run the
same with absolute calibaration (without /noabs keyword), we get the intensity in absolute
cgs unit.However, this is surprising that when we are plotting intensities
with time, we are getting the different patterns of variations in the above mentioned
two cases. This is affecting our further analysis and also confuses which one we have
to choose. Either DNs one or absolute one ?? !!!!
Why they are giving different pattern?. There should only be the
difference in magnitude. why the pattern is also varying. Which one we have to choose for our further analysis ?
Is it here any problem with absolute calibaration of EIS ?
Please suggest !
--A.K. Srivastava
Other EIS data analysis help source: